Political Leader Essay - 760 Words

The Integrity of Leadership When examining responses about qualities needed in a good leader, the common response was â€Å"integrity.† Merriam-Webster defines integrity as, firm adherence to a code of especially moral or artistic values ; incorruptibility. This definition is widely known to most; however, it stems from the Latin root Intetegritas, which translates as purity and soundness. The sum of these definitions gives one a clear picture of integrity and invokes images of the many historical figures who embodied this integral trait. Every political movement starts with a platform, a series of ideas and ideals that set the individual apart from his peers. Be it Hope and Change or Peace Through Strength, every†¦show more content†¦We crave leaders that are seemingly without fault. There is a sense of wholeness when a fully equipped leader is found. Integrity is what fills the gap and gives us the gut feeling that guides our decision. As a student observer of polit ics and a soon to be voter, the trait of integrity stands out. When my time comes to vote on a leader, the influence for my decision will come from the integrity of the candidates. A leader should show integrity on and off the media screen, he should follow through with promises that he makes, and keep his people at the forefront of his mind. If a leader can be found to meet all these requirements, the people will be able to rest easy with faith that the needs of the nation will be taken careShow MoreRelatedEssay on Immorality of Assassinating Political Leaders697 Words   |  3 PagesMore than thirty-five political leaders have been assassinated since 1825. The assassin and the political leader had different beliefs and ways they thought the government should have been run. It is thought by some, that assassination is the wrong choice to make when it comes to differences in beliefs. There are many reasons why people have different thoughts and actions on controversial subjects. Ma ny people believe that killing is the wrong choice to make because it goes against our legal systemRead MoreA Comparative and Contrasting Essay on 20th Century Black Political Leaders: Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X2551 Words   |  11 PagesA Comparative and Contrasting Essay on 20th Century Black Political Leaders: Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. And Malcolm X This essay will discuss Martin Luther King’s integration and assimilation in addition to Malcolm X’s separatism and Black Nationalism. Through Manning Marable’s assessment I will demonstrate that the ideological belief of Martin Luther King’s integration is a favourable representative of 20th century Black politics. The Civil Rights Movement symbolized the challenge and oppositionRead MoreAnalysis Of Henry David Thoreaus Civil Disobedience1432 Words   |  6 Pages Civil Disobedience or originally known as â€Å"Resistance to Civil Government† is one of the most known essay written by Henry David Thoreau. Published in 1866, it was written shortly after Thoreau spent one night in jail due to not paying a poll tax. Outraged by been imprisoned Thoreau wrote the essay to slam the government on many of the issues that were occurring at the time, some events like the Mexican-American war and slavery were the two major targets he bashed as he was opposed in goingRead MoreAnalysis Of `` On Political Labels `` By Christopher Borick And Four Words That Will Decide The Election Essay1405 Words   |  6 Pagesâ€Å"On Political Labels† by Christopher Borick and â€Å"Four Words That Will Decide the Election† by David Green both deal with how language is used in politics. Borick ’s essay is a more historical and informative of the origins of political language and key words, while Green’s essay is a game plan for the Democrats to defeat the Republicans by using their own rhetoric against them. David Green makes great points in his essay, but because of his left wing bias and his overall view of Republicans beingRead MoreAn Analysis Of Paul Robeson s The Power Of Negro Action 943 Words   |  4 PagesTITLE goes here This paper shall proceed as follows; I will begin exploring first the essay by Paul Robeson and highlighting some of the most striking and interesting facets, followed by the chapter from Rhonda Williams where I will explore the connections to the chapter by Robeson, and lastly I will look at the essay from Andrea Friedman, where I will further note interesting facets of the reading as well as create ties to the aforementioned works. Paul Robeson’s chapter â€Å"The Power of Negro Action†Read MoreWhy The North Won The Civil War995 Words   |  4 Pagesbiggest reasons behind the failure of the confederate states were not a shortage of resources, but the absence of economic unity, weak military leadership, European neutrality, surplus of democracy, and numerous partitions within the political parties. The five essays written by various expertise and compiled by Donald to provide in-depth information on major factors involved in the Civil War are impeccable for answering the question in focus, why the North won the Civil War? First of all, to describeRead MoreEffects Of The 1968 Tet Offensive On American Policy And Public Opinion About The War1310 Words   |  6 Pagesof two essays regarding America’s involvement in Vietnam, the authors offer different perspectives on the war and what led to an America defeat. In the first essay, the effects of the 1968 Tet Offensive are examined and what impact it had on American policy and public opinion about the war effort. Likewise, the second essay examines the role the news media played in the war effort and what effect they had, if any, on official and public opinion, domestically and internationally. The essay A CripplingRead MoreThe Future of Freedom1075 Words   |  5 Pagesdiscussed in this essay will be Russia and China. After the communist collapse in Russia, Zakaria writes that Russia concentrated too much on a quick fix. The leaders wanted to mimic the American democracy an instituted free and fair elections, but they forgot about establishing a stable economy. Robert Kaplan writes in his essay, Was Democracy Just a Moment? that countries need to establish a stable economic system before they try to institute a political system or else that political system willRead MorePotential Limits to Corporate Power in America Essay1246 Words   |  5 Pagespurpose of the textbook, Who Rules America? by G. William Domhoff, is to explain his theory of Class Domination. My essay emphasises the relation of social class to power, the existence of a Corporate community, the relationship of the Corporate community to the upper class, and various methods used by the Corporate community to dominate the U.S Political System. Furthermore, my essay will discuss the potential limits to corporate power in America. The realtion of social class to power, is a beliefRead MoreWhy the North Won the Civil War by David Donald: Reflection on the economic, military, diplomatic, political, and social reasons the South lost.1314 Words   |  6 Pagesauthor of each essay does acknowledge and discuss the views of the other authors. However, each author also goes on to explain their botheration and disagreement with their opposition. The purpose of this essay is to summarize each of the five arguments presented by Richard N. Current, T. Harry Williams, Norman A. Graebner, David Herbert Donald, and David M. Potter. Each author gives his insight on one of the following five reasons: economic, military, diplomatic, social, and political, respectively

The Effects Of Television On Children Is Dora A Child...

An Examination of the Negative Effects of Television on Children: Is Dora a Child Predator? In one year, a child tends to spend more time watching TV than the amount of time spent in the classroom. Beginning in 1927, the first television consisted of nothing more than a very small box that consumed a monstrous amount of energy. As years passed, World War II served as the spark in the age of the TV. Many people in the United States of America became distraught during the war. What’s more settling than buying something to make oneself feel better? As TV’s flew off the shelf, little did America know of the potential harmful effects on education. The TV has been proven to negatively affect our children’s brains. The setbacks of TV far outweigh the The Small Fry Club, Tillstrom s Kukla, Fran, and Ollie, and Robert E. Buffalo Bob Smith s Howdy Doody Time provided some of the first children’s programs aired. Cartoons became a popular Saturday morning event in the early 1960’s. This ritual benefited both the parents and the child. The kids enjoye d having such consistent entertainment and the parents managed to have some free time to themselves. However, as time passed by, the use of television did not solely rely on entertainment, but also to distract children. As I watched my mother set my one year old sister in front of the television so she could do some house work, I questioned the health hazard of TV consumption. Ironically, the term baby-sitter is a synonym for a

Hitler and Stalin free essay sample

Compare and contrast the methods used by Stalin and Hitler to keep opposition to their rule to a minimum To start off this comparison and contrast between the two great leaders, I would like to take in to account that both of them gained absolute power in the similar period of time. As we know Hitler was declared chancellor of Germany in January 1933, a few years back in 1929 Stalin emerged as the great leader and by the early 1930s he was unstoppable having no opposition that can stop his reign. There were just individuals who threatened him from time to time. After the both leaders came in complete power no or little opposition was facing them. Both leaders used different types of force to restrain their opposition, comparing the two dictators there are differences but also some similarities in using force in case the opposition tries to overtake them. Stalin faced the opposition during his rise to power 1924-1929, but also in his consolidation as a supreme leader 1930-1934. We will write a custom essay sample on Hitler and Stalin or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Stalin’s methods of dealing with the opposition mainly consisted of replacing their supporters with his own ones, and simple dismissing them for various reasons, spying and anti-communism. The contrast is that Stalin used force from the beginning, not just during the time he was at the top but also before. During his time from 1929-1953 he had individuals which tried to overtake him in votes, these people such as Kirov in 1934 didn’t last long because Stalin order his secret police to eliminate each individual who has been following Trotskyism. Using the great purge in the summer of 1936 also stated his regime and how he felt about his opponents. During this period he put many people to trial and most of them were executed. Many marshals and generals were the victims of this terror. He finished his supremacy with the Great terror. This terror lasted until 1939. Hitler used force when he gained power in 1933 arresting and prohibiting the members that were against him, the communist groups. The great German leader had used the SA to destroy the communist movement to gain power. Hitler didn’t like the behaviour from the SA leader Ernst Rohm. The SA caused a lot of riots and uncontrollable behaviour. Rohm wanted to place himself as the head of SA and the army. Hitler had different opinion on this situation and n 30 June 1934, as history likes to call it â€Å"The night of the Long Knives†, Ernst Rohm and 85 others were killed. Hitler wanted the support of the army so he can have a greater and stronger Germany. As he dismissed the SA, the unit that would substitute this position was the SS (Schutzstaffel), a secret service with special trained people. The SS has special unit inside the group called the Waffen SS (it is consisted of four units A,B,C and D). Hitler also used the Secret police called Gestapo to clean the streets and slow down the demonstrations against the Nazi party. The man who established the secret police was Hermann Goering, but later on in 1936 was taken over by Heinrich Himmler (also the leader of the SS). The force used can be compared, but it has differences. Hitler planned and had a good reason why to murder (and he wasn’t killing them, he was firing them in most cases), to make his country stronger military wise. On the Soviet side, Stalin murder because he didn’t have trust in the generals, because he wanted to be the only one who can rule the Soviet Union. Unlike Stalin, Hitler used speeches to give confidence to the people but also to go against the opposition and their opinion. Stalin really wanted to be the supreme leader and an idol for all Soviet people. The other way of sizing the opposition to a minimum was the use of Propaganda. Those are the things Hitler used against the opposition. The minister of Propaganda was Joseph Goebbels, the man who was working on Hitler’s side against the opposition, but also giving the Nazi party a better image. With the propaganda he was dismissing his opponents in 1933 while Stalin as mentioned before used the great terror to totally destroy his opposition through imprisonment and executions. To conclude, these two supreme leaders had the same but also different methods of disposing their opposition to a minimum. As it turned out both of the methods were effective. The two leaders met at the greatest battle of modern history (1941). At the end Stalin was more efficient and probably a better leader, he continued his legacy after the war until his death in 1953.

Watergate Essays (672 words) - Watergate Scandal, Watergate Seven

Watergate WATERGATE SCANDAL On the early morning of June 17, 1972, five burglars were caught inside the Democratic National Headquarters in the Watergate office building in Washington, D.C. The burglars, who had been attempting to tap the headquarters' phones, were linked to President Richard Nixon's Committee to Re-elect the President. The Nixon administration, long before the Watergate break-in, had been very careful, almost paranoid, about their public image, and did everything they could to avoid unfavorable publicity. In fact, paranoia was a ?habitual characteristic of Nixon? furthered by the public's criticism of his policies regarding the veitnam War, according to Nixon White House official Jeb Stuart Magruder. That atmosphere of paranoia and suspicion was fueled by the leaking of the Pentagon Papers, defense department documents concerning the United States' involvement in the Vietnam War. These highly secret papers were leaked by Daniel Ellsberg to the New York Times. Shortly after, Nixon established a White House special investigations unit to trace and stop any further leaks to the press. This special investigations unit was nicknamed the ?Plumbers?. It was headed by two of the President's men, G. Gordon Liddy and E. Howard Hunt. In an attempt to stop new leaks, the Plumbers investigated the private lives of Nixon's enemies and critics. G. Gordon Liddy was the mastermind behind most of CREEP's (committee to re-elect the president) political tricks and illegal activities and proposed a huge intelligence operation against the Democrats. Included in the intelligence operation were plans for a small-scale burglary of the Democratic National Headquarters, located in the Watergate office complex. When Liddy proposed the operation, Muskie (presidential candidate) was ahead of Nixon in some opinion polls and CREEP was pressured to act. John Mitchell gave the authority to Magruder, who gave Liddy the approval to perform the break-in. There was ?enough evidence from Haldeman to indicate the President knew? of the plans for the break-in before it occurred, although Nixon never gave direct orders to the Committee concerning the break-in. The June 17,1972 was not the only break-in of the Democratic Headquarters that occurred. On May 28, 1972, five burglars, carrying out Liddy's plan, broke into the headquarters in attempt to tap the phones. The Howard Johnson hotel across the street is where CREEP members monitored them. When the transcript of the phone calls reached Committee officials, they were deemed worthless. Another burglary was planned to bug the of the Democratic National Chairman, Lawrence O'Brien, who was rumored to have damaging information about President Nixon. The five burglars under the order of the Presidents re-election campaign broke into the Democratic National Headquarters, on June 17, 1972. Security guard Frank Wills caught the burglars, when he noticed tape over the locks on the doors. The burglars were arrested and charges were also filed against G. Gordon Liddy and E. Howard Hunt. The Burglars left behind $14,000 in hundred dollar bills that could be traced directly back to the Committee to Re-elect the President. Two young reporters from the Washington Post, Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein, were the first reporters to reveal to the public how deeply involved in the scandal the White House was. CREEP's role however in the Watergate break-in was greatly underestimated during the election do to Nixon's commanding lead over the Democratic presidential candidate. In fact, Nixon, won a landslide victory over the democrats, winning 49 of 50 states, to become the 37th president of the United States. Not to long after the election, the story of the scandal was broke wide open, starting with the prosecution of seven men arrested in connection with the break-in. On January 10, 1973, opening statements in the break-in trial began. The nations attention began to shift to the Watergate affair, while Judge John J. Sirica presided over the case. The seven men, Barker, Gonzalez, Martinez, Sturgis, McCord, Liddy, and Hunt, were charged with various counts of conspiracy, illegal wiretapping, burglary, and illegal possession of eavesdropping equipment. History Reports